<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The side effects from too much vitamin D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skinfitnessfacts.com/news/2008/the-side-effects-from-too-much-vitamin-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skinfitnessfacts.com/news/2008/the-side-effects-from-too-much-vitamin-d/</link>
	<description>Hydration, protection, and nutrition</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted Hutchinson</title>
		<link>http://www.skinfitnessfacts.com/news/2008/the-side-effects-from-too-much-vitamin-d/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Hutchinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skinfitnessfacts.com/news/?p=108#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Use of vitamin D in clinical practice.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377099
This paper explains why it is probably necessary to take more than 2000iu/daily/d3.
In fact the suggested safe upper limit is 10,000iu/daily and that leaves a huge safety margin as 40,000iu/daily is needed daily over many months before 25(OH)D status is raised sufficiently to cause adverse events. 
each 100iu of D3 daily will raise status 1ng or 2.5nmol/l
so 600iu will produce a 6ng 15nmol/l rise.
You will see the average UK adult status is 50nml/l and so 600iu will only make that 65nmol/l and as 80nmol/l is required to maximise calcium uptake they would remain vitamin D deficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use of vitamin D in clinical practice.<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377099" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377099</a><br />
This paper explains why it is probably necessary to take more than 2000iu/daily/d3.<br />
In fact the suggested safe upper limit is 10,000iu/daily and that leaves a huge safety margin as 40,000iu/daily is needed daily over many months before 25(OH)D status is raised sufficiently to cause adverse events.<br />
each 100iu of D3 daily will raise status 1ng or 2.5nmol/l<br />
so 600iu will produce a 6ng 15nmol/l rise.<br />
You will see the average UK adult status is 50nml/l and so 600iu will only make that 65nmol/l and as 80nmol/l is required to maximise calcium uptake they would remain vitamin D deficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
